On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Otavio Salvador
<ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>        default:
>>> -               return "unknown";
>>> +               return "<unidentified>";
>>
>> I really don't see any improvement here.
>
> It is just to avoid a i.MXunkown return; besides this is how I am
> doing in the mx23 code too.

This is OK. If you read "i.MXunkown" things are too broken already
because the chip version could not be read.

Reading "i.MX<unidentified>" will make things no better.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to