Dear Otavio Salvador, > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > >> - return "unknown"; > >> + return "<unidentified>"; > > > > Taste ist taste... but why <unidentified> is better that unknown ? > > For me it gives a visual indication that we didn't meant to support a > i.MXunknown processor ;-) i.MX<unidentified> make it easy to spot > this. > > But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because > Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.
And I like it more, it looks less like a typo. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
