On 17/06/2012 19:50, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >>> But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because >>> Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches. >> >> And I like it more, it looks less like a typo. > > Sorry; I didn't get what you meant ... should it go or not?
Hi Otavio, I make also my point clearer for Marek: my point is that the behavior for all i.MX must be consistent. If you change here, please change also for i.MX31 (that returns "unknown in print_cpuinfo) and for other SOCs that returns "unknown" in print_cpuinfo() - or let the code as now. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
