Hi Simon, Jan,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 09:43, Jan Kehren <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
>> As written, a board maintainer can't act on this.
>
> Igor's "optee: do not announce RPMB from within a supplicant RPC" should
> fix this. It is still at v3 on the list, so there is no commit to point
> at yet. I would like to send a follow-up once it lands, naming it and
> adding the "mmc dev" hint you suggest.
>
>> A follow-up could guard the mmc path with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC) and
>> drop the dependency.
>
> Good point, and happy to take that on too: avb_init_mmc() calls
> find_mmc_device() unconditionally, so it needs the guards plus a broader
> build check.
>
> With both heading for follow-ups I would rather not respin, if that sounds
> reasonable. The series has Reviewed-by throughout and Igor is rebasing on
> top, so a v4 would mostly cost him time. Mattijs, if you are happy with
> that, v3 should be ready to go and I can provide a follow-up afterwards.

I like Simon's suggestions but I'm happy with taking v3 and taking
follow-up patches.

Thanks for the great work everyone
Mattijs.

>
> (It did reach patchwork as 2322465, not sure why it didn't show up in
> the first place)
>
> Thanks,
> Jan

Reply via email to