On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 05:00:19PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > On 26 October 2026 16:58:47 GMT, Bradley Morgan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >On 26 October 2026 16:55:09 GMT, Tomas Alvarez Vanoli > ><[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>Hi all, > >>>> > >>>>Just a data point from a user: we are using U-Boot on a T1040 (QorIQ / > >>>>mpc85xx) in a product, and we intend to keep up with mainline as much > >as > >>>>we can. We'd appreciate PowerPC support staying in tree, and we're > >happy > >>>>to test patches on T1040 hardware and report back. > >>>>We run u-boot in 32-bit mode (not sure if it is possible to use 64-bit) > >>>>and > >>>>linux in 64-bit. > >>>>I am in the process of bringing it up to our 2025.07 branch and > >>>>potentially > >>>>mainlining as much as possible. We have some remnants of it under > >>>>`board/keymile/kmcent2`. > >>> > >>>Would T1042D4RDB affect you? > >> > >>Not directly from what I see in the code, as long as the shared code with > >>ARCH_T1040 is kept. Sorry for the false alarm, just wanted to report that > >>there are dozens of us using powerpc :) > > > >What you could do if you would like is to test the whole series to see if > >it unaffected you. > > > > > >Btw tom I had a idea: you merge Vincent's bug fix and my maintainers > >patch,you make a PowerPC custodian tree, and I handle the series and the > >naks and stuff and the comments. > > and btw yes I'll make the pr with the finished patches so you can merge > them cleanly
Trees are relatively cheap, but I'm not sure we need another one either for the subset of formerly-Freescale and not-QorIQ PowerPC parts. Since I added you to the fsl-qoriq tree, you can also just pick up the outstanding fixes and your maintainer patches (and leave dropping stuff for now, as this series shows today we're just getting people having a chance to see and reply to this stuff) and send me a PR. Thanks. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
