On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 12:25:48AM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > On 27 October 2026 00:19:23 GMT, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 09:27:05PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > >> On 26 October 2026 21:19:52 GMT, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 09:14:37PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > >> >> On 26 October 2026 18:30:10 GMT, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 05:27:05PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > >> >> >> On 26 October 2026 17:23:32 GMT, Tom Rini <[email protected]> > >wrote: > >> >> >> >On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 05:00:19PM +0000, Bradley Morgan wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 26 October 2026 16:58:47 GMT, Bradley Morgan > >> >> ><[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >On 26 October 2026 16:55:09 GMT, Tomas Alvarez Vanoli > >> >> >> >> ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>Hi all, > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>>Just a data point from a user: we are using U-Boot on a > >T1040 > >> >> >(QorIQ > >> >> >> >/ > >> >> >> >> >>>>mpc85xx) in a product, and we intend to keep up with > >mainline > >> >as > >> >> >> >much > >> >> >> >> >as > >> >> >> >> >>>>we can. We'd appreciate PowerPC support staying in tree, > >and > >> >> >we're > >> >> >> >> >happy > >> >> >> >> >>>>to test patches on T1040 hardware and report back. > >> >> >> >> >>>>We run u-boot in 32-bit mode (not sure if it is possible to > >> >use > >> >> >> >64-bit) > >> >> >> >> >>>>and > >> >> >> >> >>>>linux in 64-bit. > >> >> >> >> >>>>I am in the process of bringing it up to our 2025.07 branch > >> >and > >> >> >> >> >>>>potentially > >> >> >> >> >>>>mainlining as much as possible. We have some remnants of it > >> >under > >> >> >> >> >>>>`board/keymile/kmcent2`. > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>>Would T1042D4RDB affect you? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>Not directly from what I see in the code, as long as the > >shared > >> >> >code > >> >> >> >with > >> >> >> >> >>ARCH_T1040 is kept. Sorry for the false alarm, just wanted to > >> >> >report > >> >> >> >that > >> >> >> >> >>there are dozens of us using powerpc :) > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >What you could do if you would like is to test the whole > >series > >> >to > >> >> >see > >> >> >> >if > >> >> >> >> >it unaffected you. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >Btw tom I had a idea: you merge Vincent's bug fix and my > >> >maintainers > >> >> >> >> >patch,you make a PowerPC custodian tree, and I handle the > >series > >> >and > >> >> >> >the > >> >> >> >> >naks and stuff and the comments. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> and btw yes I'll make the pr with the finished patches so you > >can > >> >> >merge > >> >> >> >> them cleanly > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Trees are relatively cheap, but I'm not sure we need another one > >> >either > >> >> >> >for the subset of formerly-Freescale and not-QorIQ PowerPC parts. > >> >Since > >> >> >> >I added you to the fsl-qoriq tree, you can also just pick up the > >> >> >> >outstanding fixes and your maintainer patches (and leave dropping > >> >stuff > >> >> >> >for now, as this series shows today we're just getting people > >having > >> >a > >> >> >> >chance to see and reply to this stuff) and send me a PR. Thanks. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi, sorry, I didn't clarify enough, so I had a chat for some > >people > >> >from > >> >> >> the open src firmware slack, yes? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> And here is their answer > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Ah, Peng Fan maintains the FSL QoriQ tree: > >> >> >> https://git.u-boot-project.org/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-fsl-qoriq > >> >> >> > >> >> >> That is the vendor one though. > >> >> >> So yea, I'd go with a general PowerPC tree. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Also because QoriQ is both Arm and PPC series. :sweat_smile:" > >> >> >> > >> >> >> And even my slopper suggests the tree, for sanity purposes :D > >> >> > > >> >> >Fine, trees are still cheap. There's u-boot-ppc now. But please keep > >in > >> >> >mind everything else I said, thanks. > >> >> > >> >> Thx. > >> >> > >> >> Question: will you merge the maintainers patch on this PR, so I can > >> >focus on my add-on maintainers patch and the removals? > >> > > >> >Lets hold off on the removals a bit more, as I was saying. > >> > >> That's not what I meant > >> > >> I meant, you'd merge ONLY the maintainers patch in this PR > >> > >> Then, I'll go and take up the removals, and give it say, a couple weeks > >to > >> let it marinade, and give it responses THEN submit a PR with the > >removals > >> in it. Then happy days. > >> > >> > >> Or I could also take the maintainers patch with me too... > > > >Yes, please pick up the maintainers patches and if I follow what's in > >Peng's queue right, there are a few other powerpc fixes out there. > > > > Not in this PR, maybe any on lore that stands out? > > lx2160a is ARM > > nbxv3 is arm too. > > I'll look harder (maybe I'm wrong) soon
Maybe I'm just mis-remembering, thanks. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
