On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 6:47 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/27/26 12:59 AM, James Hilliard wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:28 PM Marek Vasut > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Make timeout configurable outside of the TFTP loop invocation, and store > >> the timeout in TFTP context. This is a preparatory patch for porting of > >> the DFU TFTP to LwIP, which requires a different timeout than the LwIP > >> default one. > > > > There seems to be substantial overlap between this series and one I > > recently sent, maybe take a look?: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261024-submit-lwip-tftp-combined-v1-v2-0-0f663f735...@gmail.com/ > That seems to be quite intrusive, is all that necessary to get the DFU > TFTP working with LWIP ?
This is more just a bunch of general TFTP LWIP fixes, it's not exactly DFU specific, although I think a number of the issues had DFU implications. > Also, are all the LWIP changes being upstreamed back into LWIP or are we > starting to grow U-Boot specific LWIP fork that would be hard to sync > back with upstream LWIP ? I think I had posted a few upstream a while back but don't think I really got any response, is LWIP upstream not particularly active?
