On 10/27/26 2:23 AM, James Hilliard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 6:47 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/27/26 12:59 AM, James Hilliard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:28 PM Marek Vasut
<[email protected]> wrote:
Make timeout configurable outside of the TFTP loop invocation, and store
the timeout in TFTP context. This is a preparatory patch for porting of
the DFU TFTP to LwIP, which requires a different timeout than the LwIP
default one.
There seems to be substantial overlap between this series and one I
recently sent, maybe take a look?:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261024-submit-lwip-tftp-combined-v1-v2-0-0f663f735...@gmail.com/
That seems to be quite intrusive, is all that necessary to get the DFU
TFTP working with LWIP ?
This is more just a bunch of general TFTP LWIP fixes, it's not exactly DFU
specific, although I think a number of the issues had DFU implications.
Also, are all the LWIP changes being upstreamed back into LWIP or are we
starting to grow U-Boot specific LWIP fork that would be hard to sync
back with upstream LWIP ?
I think I had posted a few upstream a while back but don't think I really
got any response, is LWIP upstream not particularly active?
+CC Simon
