1 way traffic!! Of course going the other way, we also generate things like "price files" that we transmit to many people via email .... never got an answer as to wether this required a licence pool or not. In the end the exercise became too hard for IBM I think, and the eventual answer was along the lines of "it depends, we would have to look at the specifics on a case by case basis" ... nothing like shifting goal posts!!
Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage > Better by Design! >-----Original Message----- >From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- >boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Steven M Wagner >Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 11:56 AM >To: U2 Users List >Subject: Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement > >Ross > >The question that I would ask, "Was this one-directional? PC to U2. Or >bi-directional? PC to U2 and back. > >One-directional is data collection. > >Bi-directional could be seen as a way around buying licences. > >Steve > >-- Sent from my Palm Pre >Ross Ferris wrote: > >Interestingly, one of the scenario's we ran past IBM back in April/March > >was the use of disk shares, where people could drop files from windows > >applications which would be picked up by a U2 phantom & processed >.... > >they characterised this as requiring a connection pool licence! > > > >Ross Ferris > >Stamina Software > >Visage > Better by Design! > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- > >>boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Batson > >>Sent: Friday, 25 September 2009 8:43 AM > >>To: U2 Users List > >>Subject: Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement > >> > >>I RedBack you would be using WebShares which is basically like > >>Connection Pools. > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org > >>[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles > >>Stevenson > >>Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:40 PM > >>To: U2 Users List > >>Subject: Re: [U2] Connection Pooling Statement > >> > >>I'm missing something. We ran Redback without connection pooling. Is > >>that an exception because it's a U2 product or were we in violation? > >> > >>Ross Ferris wrote: > >>> Doug, > >>> I fear that if you look at the terminology and description that ><IBM> > >>> (Rocket may change, but somehow I doubt it) use to describe a > >>> "connection pool", though you may like to think that your "connection > >>> manager" is "different", I fear you may fall foul of their definition > >>> .... and if you look at your 175 user system running off 2 licences > >>you > >>> can understand why (I assume that the 175 users also use "other > >>stuff", > >>> rather than everyone using NOTHING BUT your CRM) > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>U2-Users mailing list > >>U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > >>http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > >>_______________________________________________ > >>U2-Users mailing list > >>U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > >>http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > >_______________________________________________ > >U2-Users mailing list > >U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > >http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > >_______________________________________________ >U2-Users mailing list >U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
