Maybe they should have...but they did not. It looks like "...will provide a non-exclusive license for the licensee to use the following Application Software and Documentation at fees shown below on one _____ Unix _____ Computer to be located only at Licensee's Installation Address, under the Terms and Conditions shown on the reverse."
--Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jefferson, Jim Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:43 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: UV on SCO Unix Wouldn't they make the same distinction between HP-UX and SCO Unix if they follow that logic? Jim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:46 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: UV on SCO Unix I would prefer to go with RedHat... The license agreement says "Unix". The platform migration fee is ~$10k. I suspect that their lawyer would say that while Linux may be a flavor of Unix, we would still be on the hook to pay the migration fee. Bill -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
