Well, Ray has spoken, so I guess that makes it gospel. Top posting is 
"wrong-posting", and only newbies who don't know any better do it. Speak for 
yourself, Ray - I, and many others, would rather not have to scroll down in each post 
to see the new material. I want to see it at the top, and scroll down if I 
need to refresh my memory as to the context. I am not a newby - I've been in the 
computer business for 26 years, and on the internet about as long as there was 
one (BBSs before that - top posting was quite common then, too).

I do agree that the poster should trim out non-relevant material from prior 
posts, though.

Regards,
Charlie Noah

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]
  Without interposting, you have no idea where the reply 
fits into the thread.  If you are a reader that typically reads 
through an entire thread, when it's essentially dead, and don't mind 
the occasional reply that's out of place because somebody has their 
clock out of sync, or the time zone set incorrectly, then that's fine 
for you.  But top-posting still makes things more difficult for just 
about everybody else.

The byte flow problem, is the one that directly affects Cliff and the 
digests.  Unfortunately, 99.9999% of Top-Posters neglect to trim the 
quoted message to the relevant material.  That wastes huge amounts of 
bandwidth.
[snip]
There really are no valid reasons to top-post, but there are plenty 
of valid reasons to inter-post and trim the quoted material.  That's 
why it's been a flameable action on Usenet for over twenty years. 
Top-posting has only become more common in recent years because OE 
and a few other email/newsreader hybrids (that really don't do either 
well) make it tough to reply correctly and newbies are showing up 
everyday, not just in the first couple of weeks in September. 
Insisting on top-posting and not trimming the quoted material, 
especially when there's replies that have already been right-posted 
(aka inter-posted), I hate to say it, is just plain rude and self 
serving.  Please take a moment and read the material listed in the 
two links previously provided.  If you missed them, here they are 
again:
    <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
    http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

Ray
-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to