Michael, Visage does not require Javascript skills, but if you have those skills Visage allows you to use them.
The published price for Visage Designer is $2,495 USD and comes with 3 Run-Time versions. Additional Run-Time Visage versions are $265 each... but that amount is a one-time-only charge. If you want support for any Visage item, it is 20% of the original cost per item, per annum. We are currently running a special purchase plan wherein you can get the Visage Designer for $1,000 down payment and terms for the balance. Visage.BIT for data mining is $4,495 and requires at least one Visage Run-Time to view. In order to build your own data cubes (extractions) Visage.BIT requires the Visage Designer. However your clients may wish to retain you to do that for them. Developer versions of Visage Designer are what we sell. The Run-TIme costs are on par with the way most software is sold today. An application for an MS machine must be purchased for every PC using it within an enterprise or at least a Server copy which is more expensive. Visage Designer has many, many man years of R&D invested in it and would sell for a monster price if we tried to recoupe its true value. As it is priced, everyone can enjoy the benefits according to their respective benefit which grows with the number of users. Visage is extreemly impressive and can be used "right out of the box" for system development and GUI conversion. And, we have people on two continents thus far, (AU and US) to assist you with your developments. I would be pleased to speak with you and have you talk with one of the people who helped design Visage. It really is a major breakthrough for the advancement of multi-value database systems, and the Visage.BIT is so impressive that you can easily gain new clients at the "board room" level. Please let me know if you would be interested in taking a further look at this powerful tool for building new products or enhancing older ones. Kind regards, Patrick Patrick "Will" Williams, President American Computer Technics, Inc. 919-567-0042 Raleigh, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Spencer To: U2 Users Discussion List Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:12 AM Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing Last I looked at Visage, it: 1) required javascript skills 2) had no published price 3) had no developer copy available 4) had not only a developers cost but a "per seat" cost Apart from those 4 problems, however, the "movies" did make it look like an impressive product. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: March 29, 2004 3:02 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing You want Pick on the web... simple, use Visage! Patrick "Will" Williams, President American Computer Technics, Inc. 919-567-0042 Raleigh, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: David T. Meeks To: U2 Users Discussion List Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:37 AM Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing While one could make the argument that Pick has not embraced emerging technologies as rapidly as the 'Big Three', it HAS done so. U2, for example, has support for Java connectivity, XML, and I believe they either have or are working on Web Services support (I know, for example, that the DSEngine in DataStage has support for Web Services). One could argue the need or purpose of supporting certain technologies, and the level of support currently within the products, but to say that there is "little/no" support is a bit uninformed. The U2 products ARE supported in certain "Integration" software. I wouldn't typically consider SAP/PeopleSoft "integration" software. They are Enterprise Software Suites, but not geared particularly at 'integration'. However, given that SAP and PeopleSoft OEM the DataStage product sets for both of their "integration" products (SAP's BW, PeopleSoft's EPM, JDEdwards stuff as well), and given DataStage works very well with both U2 products, this point is actually wrong. People who have SAP or PeopleSoft solutions CAN, very easily, integrate their U2 data to/from those environments. As to 'efficiency', one can measure that in a variety of different dimensions. From a memory/disk space/footprint/administrative overhead dimensions, the U2 database products are VERY efficient. Finally, as to being "slow", again this depends on the measurement criteria being used. From the perspective of concurrent user access and the performance of application style DB usage (largely input/output, multiple concurrent users, etc..), the U2 products stand up very well to the mainstream guys. For support of VLDB, highly transactional query-based usage models, and the like, it does not. Trying to make the U2 products into what they are not is wrong. They are not the panacea for every database requirement. However, for certain problems, especially those for which it was designed (embedded database for application development), it is very efficient. Dave At 10:24 PM 3/28/2004 -0500, you wrote: >PICK is LEGACY Technology and does NOT Support alot of advanced >level computing we have today. I belive PICK is Similiar to Legacy DB2 >that used ISAM type of DataBases Access. Even IBM has moved DB2 (Now UDB) >to a completly relational architecture. > >I belive some of the below are good reasons to Migrate to >MainStream (Top 3 - DB2/Oracle/MSSQL etc) Databases. > >1. UV has Little/NO support for Emerging Technologies(XML/XQuery/XSLT/WML etc) >2. UV is Not supported in Most Integration Enterprise Software >(SAP/PeopleSoft) >3. UV is Not efficient compared to highly evolved databases(DB2/Oracle) >4. UV Folks seem to use PICK, which is Not Compatible with many of > of the Current Advanced Technologies and Techniques. >5. UV is very SLOW, TOO Procedural and Not the right tool for > an OLTP Environment. > >It would be nice if IBM provided a Package to convert all UV Stuff to >IBM DB2 and perhaps provide some kinda code converter to convert >all pick stuff to DB2 Stored Procs or Java Native Compiled Procedures. >I belive this would be ideal and would help corportations intergrate >systems easily. > >Joe Eugene > > > >________________________________ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Phil Walker >Sent: Sun 3/28/2004 7:59 PM >To: U2 Users Discussion List >Subject: RE: The lists are closing > > > >David, > >As the list is closing this is probably not off topic - so I will comment. > >I believe PICK has been around since the mid to late 1960's, whereas Oracle >and the SQL relation model has been around only since the mid to late 1970's >early 1980's if you are talking about Oracle etc. > >I may be wrong. > >Phil Walker >+64 21 336294 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >infocusp limited >\\ PO Box 77032, Auckland New Zealand \ www.infocusp.co.nz >DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is >confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose >or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that >you have received the message and then please destroy. infocusp limited is >not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any >attachments after sending by infocusp limited. We use virus scanning >software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar in this >email or any attachment > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) >Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:36 PM >To: U2 Users Discussion List >Subject: RE: The lists are closing > >Best of luck Jeff, however I will point out the obvious, what is your >definition of modern? I would have thought the good old "relational >databases" have been around since before pick anyway? 8-) > >Regards > >David Logan >Database Administrator >HP Managed Services >139 Frome Street, >Adelaide 5000 >Australia > >+61 8 8408 4273 >+61 417 268 665 > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Behalf Of Jeff Ritchie >Sent: Monday, 29 March 2004 8:03 AM >To: U2 Users Discussion List >Subject: RE: The lists are closing > > >Thanks for the memories Cliff :) > >Sorry to hear the lists are closing, but what the heck time and tide, >work committments etc. > >As some one who is shortly to be ex mv, and moving into the more modern >technologies l will decline the offer to join, but wish the site all the >best. > >Cheers, >Jeff > >-----Original Message----- >From: Moderator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2004 7:14 PM >To: U2 Users Discussion List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: The lists are closing > > >Dear Friends: > >After 10+ years of either hosting or supporting the info-prime, >info-unidata, info-vmark, info-informix, and u2-users etc lists, I have >decided to shut down the list server. > >u2-users and u2-community will cease to exist as of 1 April 2004. IBM is > >officially supporting the efforts of the new U2UG.org group. (Yes. I am >a member of the establishing Board of that group. So this is not a >"coup" or Sour Grapes!) If you check out the forums that have been set >up, I think you will will see that they cover everything anyone has >asked for over the years in this group. > >I *really* want to encourage ALL of you to come over the the >www.u2ug.org site and support this effort. This is *exactly* what many >of you on this list have wanted over the years. If Not Now, When? > >Almost ten years on my Watch. How many years before that on Mike >O'Rear's Watch? In the Net World, this has been a Hell of a good run. (I > >just couldn't resist tripping the Net Nanny filters one last time <very >evil grin>) > >I'll see all of you on the other media, ok? > >-- > >Regards, > >Clif > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >W. Clifton Oliver, CCP >CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES >Tel: +1 619 460 5678 Web: www.oliver.com >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > > >-- >u2-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ======================================================================== David T. Meeks || "All my life I'm taken by surprise Architect, Technology Office || I'm someone's waste of time Ascential Software || Now I walk a balanced line [EMAIL PROTECTED] || and step into tomorrow" - IQ ======================================================================== -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
