Make sure you reboot before you downgrade. On Thu, January 5, 2017 4:22 pm, Steve Barnes wrote: > Jerry are you finding going back to 5.6.9 can stabilize this issue. We > have Rocket M5(XM) that are doing the same thing. One sector just had 6 > clients offline and rebooting the AP restored all the clients. > > We had a few clients that were having issues and after reverting back to > 5.6.9 the radios died. Don't want to do that on a 300ft tower AP when > its 17 degrees outside. > > Steve Barnes > Wireless Operations Manager > New Lisbon Broadband > NLBC.COM > PCSWIN.COM > 765-584-2288 ext:1101 > > > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > On Behalf Of Jerry Head > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 3:45 PM > To: ubnt_users@wispa.org > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp > > > I would advise against putting 6.0 on XM APs. As they drop subs with that > version. A reboot gets them back but...yuck. > > > On 1/5/2017 10:39 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: > Just try going to 6.0 first on AP and STA and see if it improves. Also > make sure you Airview scan that you're on the best channel. > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:17 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller > <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: > > > will play with 5.6.9 later today - anyone else able to comment on this? > back to the initial question - am i trying too hard with 10 meg packages > on 2.4 rockets with these numbers? should the radios be able to do that? do > i need to go post in ubnt forums? :) > > maybe i will.... lol > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: RickG<mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:12 AM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp > > > Yes and the time frame matches the 5.6.x FW suspicion. It comes & goes > and so far I have not been able to pinpoint it. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Ken Patrick > <patr...@my9ja.com<mailto:patr...@my9ja.com>> wrote: > Jay, > > > We get these complaints from customers and I have always ignored it as > long as everything looks fine from our end. But this has increased > significantly since the Virus and 5.6.x firmware and I think we need to > critically look at it and not dismiss it. There is no way a ton of > customers can be hallucinating at the same time > > The complaints are usually in the form of its slow or the internet goes > off and on especially if you are on the DFS band. > > Is anyone else experiencing this kinds of complaints ?? > > > > Regards > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:45 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller > <par...@cyberbroadband.net<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: > > > oh, if you're wondering, management downgraded him to our lowest package > today and said "do not upgrade him even if he asks" we suspect he'll visit > his parents more :) base package is 3 meg > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: CBB - Jay Fuller<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 9:40 PM > Subject: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp > > > > We've got an average of 14 users on our 2.4 rockets. 10 mhz channels. > some are sectors, some are omnis. > > Currently one 2.4 rocket has 13 connections (one guy dropped for > t-mobile??!!) I guess that makes sense, no one else has t-mobile down > here.... - so here are the current stats : > > airmax quality - 83% airmax capacity - 80% > > here is the stations list and their signals - > > [cid:image001.jpg@01D26770.0D24CF80] > > > Access point is running 6.0 ; stations are 5.6.3 > That'll change soon - maybe end of January. > > > > I have a 2nd 2.4 rocket we are also monitoring - it also has 14 users on > it > > airmax quality is 75% airmax capacity is 70% > > also running 6.0 stations are 5.6.3 > > [cid:image002.jpg@01D26770.0D24CF80]\ > > > I am selling 10 meg packages off these access points. In some cases > folks are buying more than that. Sometimes I can get 22 meg linktests > using the ubnt speed tests. > > I've noticed in the last week or two i've seen people disconnecting - > > > "i'm only getting 2 meg, this is not acceptable" > > > here's my favorite - a kid files a complaint against us with the bbb - > > "If you can avoid doing business with this company, I would STRONGLY > suggest it. This company is very sneaky, and claims that the incredibly > poor service and frequent downtime is simply out of their hand. They > offer a "completely unlimited package" for xxxxx in which they CLAIM "as > much connectivity as your radio allows". After compiling data from around > 100+ bandwidth connections tests over the course of 6 months, with the > average speed being around 7Mbits (896 kilobytes). The pricing is not > even close to reflecting the service, the cap on the xxxxxx package is > 10Mbits, so I am not even reaching the average on that. I can only say > that the highest tier package is nothing short of a scam. Whenever I > called to complain about this outrageous service, I was told that it was > too bad, and that nothing will be done. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a conman, > relying on shady business tactics to further his greed." > > btw - i can't recall any downtime within the last year and, well, i just > love human beings. > > i am wondering - - am i asking too much out of these access points? > > usage graphed - > > access point 1 - > > [cid:image003.jpg@01D26770.0D24CF80] > > > access point #2 > > [cid:image004.jpg@01D26770.0D24CF80] > > > > btw - i should add the kid who filed the complaint lives in his parents > barn (yes, i said barn) and has his own connection separate from his > parents. > > question - am i asking too much of these access points? > > yes - i'm waiting on the rocket 2ac prism - - and these are our two > busiest 2.4 rockets - - but i am also getting complaints on other parts of > our network. > > ok - thanks in advance. > > > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > -- > -RickG KyWiFi > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > -- > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com<http://www.mnwifi.com/> > 507-634-WiFi > [http://www.snoitulosten.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/facebook-small.jpg > ]<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on > Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > > Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
