This kind of thing is why i am a huge fan of putting the station device in 
router mode.  Customers connecting layer2 to my tower setup has always seemed a 
bad idea to me.

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv

> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:28 AM, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com> wrote:
> 
> Stuart he was simply trying to set up a way to control something remotely 
> with a static public IP address.
> 
> Apparently one of us was doing something wrong that caused a loop that 
> Netonix caught.
> 
>> On Jan 26, 2017 6:24 AM, "Stuart Pierce" <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:
>> 99.86% sure it's paranoia, but I'd like to know what Mr. WILSON ( sorry I
>> was channeling my inner Dennis ) thinks the customer was setting up.
>> 
>> On Thu, January 26, 2017 12:53 am, RickG wrote:
>> > Ya know, I've always suspected UBNT CPE leaks or am I just paranoid?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 PM, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Looks like a customer with a static public IP was setting up something.
>> >>  Even though he is on a routed port of a switch (our CPEs are routed)
>> >> something he did somehow caused a loop.
>> >>
>> >> On Jan 25, 2017 9:04 PM, "Eric Tykwinski" <eric-l...@truenet.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> I just tested STP on my little home AirRouter running v6.  Running
>> >>> RSTP
>> >>> on the Cisco and bridged on the AirRouter with STP enabled, it never
>> >>> went to blocked on either port.  I think there might be a bug in v6
>> >>> for STP. Weird part was switch was still saying rstp, and I think
>> >>> AirOS only
>> >>> supports STP.   I might dig a bit further later on…
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Chris Soiles <csoi...@riocities.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Could be some kind of crosstalk and thinking it's a loop
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I usually turn off STP unless I know there is multipath in that
>> >>> segment
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from iPhone 6S Plus
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Chris Soiles
>> >>> Owner
>> >>> Rio Cities
>> >>> csoi...@riocities.net 505-966-6389
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:18 PM, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We didn't have STP enabled on any of the ports.  This is strange -
>> >>> these devices have been working together for a year.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's been stable for several minutes now that I turned off loop
>> >>> protection.
>> >>>
>> >>> Don't see how I could get a loop in one device.   ???
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank for coming to the rescue!   :)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:15 PM, James Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> I just did some Google searches and turned off Loop Protection in
>> >>>> the Devices/Configuration page.  So far ok...
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Josh Luthman <
>> >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> If you DEFINITELY don't have a bridge loop (like two backhauls
>> >>>>> going to this tower, both of which go to the same collision
>> >>>>> domain) you can disable port 2 from the STP.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Josh Luthman
>> >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> >>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>>>> Suite 1337
>> >>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, James Wilson
>> >>>>> <ja...@ridgecomms.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have a very straightforward flat network, no OSPF, etc.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Tonight I started losing connection and traced it back to a
>> >>>>>> Netonix
>> >>>>>> switch. The connection is up for a minute then the Netonix
>> >>>>>> switch turns off the AF5X's port.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Below is what it's log is saying.  I don't understand how the
>> >>>>>> AF 5X
>> >>>>>> that's connected to the port can cause a loop.  Help!   Thanks!
>> >>>>>> :)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 17:39:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 17:42:39 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 17:43:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 17:46:40 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:03:04 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:06:05 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:06:39 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:09:40 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:15:17 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:18:18 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:22:19 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:25:21 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:25:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:28:40 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:34:13 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:37:14 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:37:22 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:40:24 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:41:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:44:39 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:45:37 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:48:39 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:49:33 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:52:35 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:53:39 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 18:56:41 Loop
>> >>>>>> protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 18:58:36 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds Jan 25 19:00:36 UI:
>> >>>>>> Configuration changed by admin (172.19.3.6)
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 19:00:36 UI: Port 2 STP: changed from 'Disabled' to
>> >>>>>> 'Enabled'
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 19:01:38 Loop protection: re-enabling port 2
>> >>>>>> Jan 25 19:02:38 Loop protection: detected loop from port 2 to
>> >>>>>> port 2, disabling port 2 for 180 seconds
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -RickG KyWiFi
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to