I'm now subscribed to ubuntu-art, which I should have done that earlier, but I guess better late than never. I hope replying works fine, without starting a new thread.
On 4/3/06, Daniel Borgmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/3/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The progressbar does not look like a shiny, glassy, rounded kind of > > tube, that the point! > > http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/progressbar3.png > > That does (more), but you don't want to tone it down? It currently just flat > > out doesn't look like anything. Why not compromise? > > That looks very good to me, I'll make sure that Richard sees it (he > did the progressbar implementation). I never said it's perfect, just > that it should not look exactly like the titlebar (which you seem to > agree with now). The progressbar looks okay to me. It's kind of plain, but it makes white text more readable, which is a good thing. The color seems to match the other widgets more, so that's a plus as well. Now before we implement it, I'd like Mark's approvement. The progressbar was modelled after an icon the Human icon theme and Mark really liked that. I think he'll approve with bvc's version too though, but I don't want to make such "big" changes so close to release without making sure he's fine with it. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
