Greetings Chuck! Am Mittwoch, den 29.11.2006, 21:07 -0800 schrieb Chuck Huber:
> As Troy mentioned, you'll have to speak with Mark about "any non-obvious > things in the pipe". :( Ok. I've learned that Mark has the final word on what goes in and what does not "visual appeal"-wise. > I had a thought about your(or any) face chooser and concerns you raised > at the bottom of your wiki page regarding security. As an IT manager > there are times that I don't want to give away ANY more information than > I absolutely have to-- so a face chooser probably won't be a fit on > every machine in any one organization. The face-browser can be disabled, of course. It's only new that is will be enabled by default. > That said, your design looks excellent and it would be a shame to let 1 > out of a 100 machines slow your progress. Therefore would it be > possible to have your face chooser put(non-scrolling) Ubuntu artwork in > place of the faces via an option? That way, managers can keep the same > great aesthetics as typical desktop computers, but by selecting the > "Turn off face browser" feature it can be used for servers. Hm... so do I get you right here... you suggest that in addition to having the option to simply turn off the face-browser (thus using the normal gdm-code which is in place already), it should offer mode of operation using fall-back photos not revealing _any_ actual user-photos (btw a fall-back photo will be used in the case of the face-browser being enabled and some user not having provided a photo for the face-browser)? If that's the case, this would be a bit odd and not make much sense :) Please explain your idea a bit more in detail. Best regards... Mirco "MacSlow" Müller -- email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] www - http://macslow.thepimp.net lowfat - http://macslow.thepimp.net/sponsor-it -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art