On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 21:37 +0100, Damian Vila wrote: > But the problem is not at "brown vs. blue" (or green or whatever). > I've never questioned the use of color. I rather constrained to the > given guidelines. And I believe this is the way I should work if I want > to collaborate with Ubuntu.
What we have in terms of guidelines seems already willy-nilly, as there's no strategy defined, no audience, no message, no goal. > What I would like to see is more information. And a clear set of > guidelines, not just a color palette. Yes! Who wouldn't agree? > I don't know, maybe I'm asking for too much. But I believe that we are > not here to define the audience, or even the concept. I believe those > roles are assigned to other people that work for Canonical. We are here > to help reach a reasonable good and professional rendition of that > concept for the next version of Ubuntu. It would be preferable. But if Canonical doesn't deliver, there would be the option for us to propose a strategy/concept/design to them. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
