On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:38 -0600, Ryan Prior wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> > > wrote: > > > > The shading could be read as if the button is rounded, bulging > > outwards, > > but with an inward dent roughly of the size of the inner > > circle of the > > CoC. > > > > That's pretty specific. Is this a well-known design pattern, or just a > > gut feeling for what would look good? > > Neither. It is simply a description of one possible interpretation of > the picture, without judgement if that would be a good or bad thing to > strive for. > > The mere fact that I'm not sure how to read and what is intended can be > seen as a problem. > > By offering a description, Sebastian can check if that is what he is > trying to get across or not, possibly tweaking it to either encourage or > discourage that interpretation. Reading over it again, I see that you were interpreting his work, not making a suggestion. Oops. I read it as the whole logo being inlaid into the "glass", which is pretty consistent with your interpretation I think. I like it. > Ryan, I really wonder what the root of our communication problem is. Please stick with me; in this case I misread your words. :-)
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art