Kenneth Wimer wrote: > I do want to see things change, but I want to 1,000% certain that we > are doing the right thing before we change *anything*. > > > -- > Kenneth The only way this is possible, is if we adopt a working policy from someone else and then slowly organically mold it around our specific needs. Can we contact the redhat/fedora people and see how well their system is working? Do you know anyone on their artwork team? Judging from the quality of artwork they throw out, they seem to have their @$$3$ in gear.
I am if favor of Cory's plan, but I really have no idea what a council will do? Moderate the new list? If the new list is to have entry level requirements, why would it need moderators? The way I see it is: When I submit something I am working on, I always ask for feedback. Now I generally get feedback from certain members, and this feedback is always good (whether I agree or not.) I value these members' opinions as I trust them. I always take in other peoples feedback, but I do not necessarily trust them to know what they are talking about. This is why I am in favor of this list. When I want feedback on specifics half done ideas in a project: new list. As the project comes closer to finishing: old list. new project idea: old list. --Saleel -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
