While on the topic of MS speaking at a LUG event, I had a similar request by MS to speak at the Singapore LUG in 2006. The request came from MS and they wanted to have two persons to come talk to the membership.
As president of the Singapore LUG, I posed this to the committee and we were all in favour. When working out the details, the MS offer slowly disintegrated. I asked the contact if the speakers will be willing to take questions. Initially, the answer was yes. Then the reply was that the speakers would want to take questions only after they have both spoken. Then a third email came saying that any question asked has to be written and it will be collected, vetted and then answered (if at all). I said that this is tantamount to censoring and not being open and I cannot impose this on the audience/membership. They retorted that I should ensure that the speakers are treated fairly and that they should not be "abused". I gave my word that I will ensure that we have a civil discussion, but that was not enough. The day before the scheduled talk, they chicken^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hwithdrew. So, while it is good to give them a hearing, make sure that they do not pull tricks. -- Harish Pillay [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg id: 746809E3 fingerprint: F7F5 5CCD 25B9 FC25 303E 3DA2 0F80 27DB 7468 09E3 -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au