On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 22:55 +1000, Tony "H.G" Candito wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jared Norris <jrnor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This same small > > group of people then flooded the mailing list with email after email > > essentially just rehashing the same thing over and over again. > > Lot's of hidden ass-kissing and contradictions. People weren't helping > precisely because Mellisa has the "keys" to the car in the first > place, and the very prospect of that being up for dispute made people > contribute (if you'd call talking about said keys going to someone > else contribution). I'm not sure how this is not all blatantly > obvious.
I honestly believe that those who contacted the LoCo council about their "alternate loco" (for lack of a better name) with no discussion of their actions on the list to be unethical. It strike me that those involved in this group/faction were only motivated by their own ego, and this post confirms that. My 2 year old son enjoy wrecking something my older son is enjoying just because he can't do what he likes - I see some parallels here. > These walls of texts aren't going to do much good. Telling people they > have "freedom to do whatever" is one of the reasons the LoCo was > rejected, there is no direction, support or ownership in it's current > structure, and I don't care how controversial it is to say it's > because of who's in place. It seem that you (and possibly others) have personal issues with Melissa. I don't think this list is the appropriate forum for you (and others) to continue their vendetta against her. Lets develop a process for making decisions and moving forward, rather than attack Melissa. I, like others, think that Melissa has done a good job of being the team contact for the LoCo, for a start she has tried to grow it, not smash it. > Flame on. Hardly a constructive way to end your contribution. Cheers Dave -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au