Eu concordo plenamente, porem é bom salientar que atualizações de segurança o próprio nome já diz, agora informar que estão disponíveis atualizações de segurança e instalar GAMES no lugar é um pouco destemperado em meu churrasco, creio que o correto é informar o usuário que existem atualizações disponíveis, porem na linguagem que consta no sistema do próprio.
2010/12/15 justindisgustin <96...@bugs.launchpad.net> > I'm a relatively advanced user and there was no way for me to feel > confident in choosing one of these options without doing research. Not only > is the wording ambiguous, but the options are too few. For example, what if > for some reason I wanted the security updates to be downloaded in the > background? Or what if I wanted all updates to be automatically installed? > These seem like separate issues but they are part of why the ambiguous > wording is problematic. Why does one of these options pertain to security > updates only, while the other two pertain to all updates? This adds to the > confusion. I like the idea of a grid of radio buttons that was suggested, > but if the text could be made more clear and possibly have the option to > hover over or click on the text for more detailed information, it would help > too. > Something should be changed, anyway. I think that this should actually be > a higher priority because even though it's an issue of wording, the wording > is describing settings for a very important function. I think to say that > this is of low importance is like saying that documentation for a given > software is trivial. If everything works as intended by the developer but > people don't know how the developer intended it to work, the potential for > misuse is great. > > ** Description changed: > > - In Feisty the options for automatic updates in the Software Sources > - window are unclear. > + In Feisty, Intrepid, Jaunty, Karmic and Lucid the options for automatic > + updates in the Software Sources window are unclear. > > Currently they are: > > -Install security updates without confirmation. > -Download all updates in the background > -Only Notify about updates > > Which leads to the obvious, and I imagine wrong-headed, question - What > if I want to install security updates without confirmation and download > all updates in the background? > > I can infer that the security policy goes from most automated to least, > and so that if I'm installing security updates I'm also downloading the > rest. But why not spell it a little more clearly? I remember the old > language seemed good but this is the best I can do, ordered from least > automated to most: > > Notify about available updates and ask for permission to install. > - but don't install any. > + but don't install any. > Download all updates in the background and install security updates > without confirmation. > > If that is too long, I think this might be explicit enough, though still > potentially ambiguous. > > Only notify about available updates. > Download all updates in the background. > Download all updates in the background and install security updates > without confirmation. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to > Software Properties. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96705 > > Title: > Unclear language about Automatic Updates in Software Sources > > Status in The apt sources.list editor used in Ubuntu (and Kubuntu): > New > Status in “synaptic” package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > In Feisty, Intrepid, Jaunty, Karmic and Lucid the options for automatic > updates in the Software Sources window are unclear. > > Currently they are: > > -Install security updates without confirmation. > -Download all updates in the background > -Only Notify about updates > > Which leads to the obvious, and I imagine wrong-headed, question - What if > I want to install security updates without confirmation and download all > updates in the background? > > I can infer that the security policy goes from most automated to least, and > so that if I'm installing security updates I'm also downloading the rest. > But why not spell it a little more clearly? I remember the old language > seemed good but this is the best I can do, ordered from least automated to > most: > > Notify about available updates and ask for permission to install. > but don't install any. > Download all updates in the background and install security updates without > confirmation. > > If that is too long, I think this might be explicit enough, though still > potentially ambiguous. > > Only notify about available updates. > Download all updates in the background. > Download all updates in the background and install security updates without > confirmation. > > > > > -- *VISITE MEU BLOG http://jujubasblog-jubasblog.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/jujubasblog/with_friends<link*> JS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96705 Title: Unclear language about Automatic Updates in Software Sources -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
