Well if you see the history, it's not really 3 full years of development but rather two main changes which lead to: 1. One bug fix (relevant for users of flatpak in ubuntu too) 2. Support for homed
Together with other main fixes, but I see the risk here, reason why I actually included more tests [1] into the integration tests that we had running in autopkgtests but that we were allowing it to fail (as per bug 2146367), de facto accepting any other potential regression to go unnoticed (and we've been quite lucky that this did not happen). The tests are now instead passing and checking more things, including further fixes (e.g. for bug 2146366). However, while I feel that the homed support and the additional fixes for flatpaks could be useful for the LTS users, I'd be fine if we'd go with the fixes that are part of 23.13.9-8ubuntu3 (in queue ATM) together with further fixes for lp:2146151, lp:2146367 and lp:2146352. In fact, while those fixes have been already prepared for the current ubuntu version [2], my feeling was that it would be safer to just use the upstream-released version that is being tested by other distros too and from which it would be easier to pick potential (security) upstream fixes int the next years, in a so relevant component. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/accountsservice/-/blob/ubuntu-devel/debian/tests/integration.py [2] https://salsa.debian.org/freedesktop-team/accountsservice/-/commits/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2146352 Title: FFe: accountsservice 26.12.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/2146352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
