Steven Susbauer wrote: > On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Shentino wrote: > > >> Just curious, but would Landscape have any feature set overlap with >> what we're talking about here? I read that canonical uses it >> commercially. >> >> > > This has brought my focus back on the subject line for what we're all > replying to. I think it's been stated quite widely now that using a > GUI to configure Apache, SMTP, etc is probably unwise (RHEL seems to > disagree, but whatever), I don't think it is necessarily a bad thing > to have a gui for domain server administration, or essentially what > landscape is already doing, at least in part: controlling users, > pushing updates, monitoring systems; it may be worth looking at. >
RHEL has a tool for SMTP/Apache? Hands up those who know end users that understand tcp/ip enough to decide on a static ip for the UDS server that will host the user account database, the update repository and the monitoring software. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
