On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:44:47 -0500 Marc Deslauriers <marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > That means users could choose: > > * The LTS release > > * The rolling release updated daily or as frequently as desired > > * The rolling release updated at least monthly > > I like the monthly snapshot idea. It allows us to set goals, > promote new features, and allows technical enthusiasts to use the > development release without having the massive package churn every > single day. This also isolates them from bad uploads in the rare > cases where they may occur. A monthy snapshot allows us to (as Marc points out) to set goals and promote new features. But we should be really strict there -- no last-minute changes (like, historically, we have seen with Unity). If something is not ready, then this something *MUST* be postponed. We will be now, at most, delaying one month (or a few days). I am all for rolling release process between LTSs, but, please, let's do it right. ..C..
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
