On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 17:09 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > More clearly, I think we should: > > * Stop making interim releases. > > This entails also dropping freezes for the non-LTS cycles, or would we > still have freeze cycles during the monthly cadence?
I hope that we will. My biggest worry with the rolling release methodology is that there is no deadlines for people to work towards except the LTS deadlines. This will then encourage more polishing and refining, with a rush to an even bigger deadline. We could all say "you should be more disciplined than that," which is a truism, but one that seems to ignore human nature. So I hope that there will be deadlines for the monthly releases that people can target, and use for their own milestones. Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
