On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Thursday, March 07, 2013 08:01:37 PM Allison Randal wrote: >> On 03/07/2013 07:15 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > Maintaining the current cadence should also be one of the options. >> >> That would be the default if no proposal was submitted to the TB or no >> proposal approved by the TB. >> >> Or, do you mean there's value in writing up the advantages of the >> current cadence in parallel to the other options, for a clearer >> comparison? I can see that. > > Yes. If options are going to be presented to the TB, stick with what we have > should be one of them.
I presume that if there is no proposed change, there would be no proposal to take to the TB, hence leaving off the current way of working as an option. :-) Jono -- Jono Bacon Ubuntu Community Manager www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
