On 12 March 2013 17:23, Phillip Susi <ps...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 3/9/2013 6:45 AM, Otus wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Robert Bruce Park >> <robert.p...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> >>> Although I feel quite strongly about my support for the rolling >>> release model, if it is rejected, we can't continue as we used to. We >>> simply do not have the resources to support more than two releases at >>> a time. I'd prefer to only have to support LTS+rolling, but LTS+"one >>> interim at a time" would be an acceptable second best. >> >> >> If you need/wish to cut down the number of supported releases all the >> way down to two at a time (from current ~5) there are really only two >> options: > > > I am pretty sure he meant all supported LTS count as one, and the goal is to > not have more than one non LTS supported. >
LTS releases must overlap to allow for upgrades. Plus the benefit of LTS is its longer support, e.g. even reaching beyond the next two LTS release. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
