On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/1/8 Jonathan Lange <[email protected]>: >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2010/1/8 James Westby <[email protected]>: >>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:58:04 +1100, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >>>> This does raise other questions in my mind. Are we excluding some >>>> packages before we really start? >>> >>> I don't know. I guess we only would be if the top 100 list was not >>> actually the 100 most important packages. I'm not actually sure where >>> that list comes from. >>> >> >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+upstreamreport > > I guess I meant "I don't know how it's defined" but > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/UpstreamReport does actually > define it: top 100 by number of open bugs. So it will vary over time, > and it's also plausible that these are amongst the most interesting > packages in Ubuntu. It might be interesting to measure the most > popular packages in ppas, but this will do for now. >
To avoid the moving target problem, I've hardcoded the database IDs of the top 100 in the queries I've pasted, and also in the lpstats graph. jml -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
