We had a big push on hottest100 last week, and it was good. A fairly recent copy of the hottest100 results are below.
To summarize where we got to: most of the upstream branches are now working; there are a few not correctly registered but that could probably be fairly easily fixed. In package branches a bit over half of the ones we sampled are working, and there are specific bugs for the failures. Jelmer set up to run the check-hottest.py script across everything in Ubuntu main; it shows things much less complete there, mostly in terms of making upstream links. We could go through and get them all to pass but that seems like it would be kind of missing the point: we want to get people motivated to be using this and for the tool to make that easy. The point of doing hottest100 is to shake out any problems and get some measurement of what's going wrong. I see people are now registering imports and apparently using them. So where do we go from here? Specific actions from here at least for the Canonical Bazaar people are: * help james_w with some of the bugs opened against the package importer (assuming he wants it) * talk to the Launchpad developers (through bugs or otherwise) about making the story of adding a new import, package-product link, etc easier * keep running this script at intervals so that we can track what kind of snags things seem to hit * work on udd-related bugs like the issues raised here before, and the more general stuff about getting multiple branches or UDD-like merge scenarios -- Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>
status
Description: Binary data
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel