On Tuesday 31 October 2006 07:11, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps creating a generic "en" translation from the then old "en_GB", > and having en_GB become localised. This would allow derivatives > (including en_GB) to all pull from one generic source, and to go back to > it in future. Or is this overkill?
I don't think that this will happen, as it would put us totally out of sync
with other projects, by using a non-standard language naming schema.
--
Sridhar Dhanapalan
{GnuPG/OpenPGP: http://www.dhanapalan.com/yama.asc
0x049D38B4 : A7A9 8A02 78CB AB1B FCE4 EEC6 2DD9 249B 049D 38B4}
Need to fork out $$$ for the next software upgrade? Break the cycle!
http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net
pgp3TNuH18oqp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-l10n-eng mailing list Ubuntu-l10n-eng@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-l10n-eng https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EnglishTranslation
