> > I agree with Matt that we should always attempt to push changes > upstream. Non-UI changes seem like a no-brainer. In time upstream > component owners might have to decide if they want to support a > Hildon-esque UI in addition to their standard UI which could be more > than a few #define's. >
I would think (hope) in the case of GNOME, they would be very interested in the hildonized "mobile" ui for some of their components, as they have commited to support GNOME Mobile http:// www.gnome.org/mobile/. That project looks like it's still very early stage, but we should certainly coordinate with them as it sounds like it's inline with our vision. > Lastly, perhaps we could agree on some standards for branching > existing > projects. For example #ifdef <tag>, for code, Makefile.am, > configure.in, etc. Then we could easily go to a project and find > where/if someone else had added mobile-device-specific changes. > > <tag> = MID or UME or HILDON or MOBILE > (My vote is "MID") > Bob I agree. Maybe you guys could post on the GNOME mobile list (mobile- [EMAIL PROTECTED]) to propose some of these ideas. -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
