Hi, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:39:21 +0200 Daniel Holbach > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 15:20 +1000 schrieb Sarah Hobbs: >>> Michael, what in hell were you thinking? >> This kind of language is not necessary. It does not help coming to a >> solution. >> > While in general I might agree with you, while the language may be a bit > strong, it's a perfectly reasonable question from a member of the community > to a candidate for MOTU Council and should be answered. > > Scott K >
(This is not a direct answer, I'm talking about the whole thread) The beginning of this thread was raising an interesting point, and it turned into a personal attack against Michael, on a public mailing list. I really don't think he diserves that (nobody does). This is more unacceptable to me than any possible broken package in a repository which exists so that such packages can be tested (people who enables this repo *know* that breakages can happen). Please let's try to avoid that kind of behaviour, there are smarter ways to deal with problems in Ubuntu. Gauvain -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
