On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 18:11, Jordan Mantha wrote: > > > My feeling is that the best way to help make sure this kind of thing > > doesn't happen is to have *one*, canonical place to track merges. > Launchpad > > bugs seems to be the best way we have of doing that currently. > Basically, > > file a merge bug if you're going to be working on a merge and *all* > people > > working on merges, including MOTU sponsors, should be looking *first* to > > see if somebody has already filed a bug before working on it. > > Personally I'd find a file a bug first rule very demotivating. One more > rule > to convince me to spend my time on other things. Contributors already have to file a bug so I figured it'd be easiest for them. A comment on MoM (when that works) would also suffice, IMO. The point being, people need a place to check to see if somebody else is working on a merge and people *especially* need to be checking. -Jordan P.S. The idea of me having to wait for somebody else's OK just to do a merge, even though I'm a MOTU/Core Dev, is very demotivating.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
