On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Alex Lourie <djay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Gema Gomez < > gema.gomez-sol...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks Alex, let's aim at re-writing as many as we can and after they >> are reviewed we can put them back on the wiki substituting the old ones, >> so that new test cases can be used for Alpha 2 testing. >> >> > I second that. I recommend prioritising here, so I believe it is better to > begin with ISO test cases, then continue to application test cases. > Moreover, we should probably prioritise the ISO cases as well, so we > concentrate on more important ones first. > > OK, so thinking about this further, I came up with the following: 1. As I previously recommended, work on ISO tracker test cases first, deal with everything else later. 2. Select few representing flavours from the list on [1] 3. Rewrite mandatory test cases. 4. When 3. above is done, rewrite the run-once test cases. 5. When 4. above is done, rewrite optional test cases. 6. Repeat 3-5 for other flavours until all test cases for ISO testing are rewritten. 7. Approve all tests. ( I recommend at least one peer review per test, just to be on a safe side). Feedback on this would be extremely helpful, especially I'd like to have the consensus on the first bunch of flavours to rewrite (I guess, main Ubuntu i386 Desktop/server, Kubuntu and Xubuntu should get there). I'd set a first bunch to 5-7, so we see how it goes. Thanks [1] http://91.189.93.73/qatracker/milestones/205/builds -- Alex Lourie
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
