Oops! Cheers for the catch Nicholas :-) The concept I was impressed most in Pasi's design was his focus to place information closest to where he thought most useful. In line with this I made my suggestion; when I am testing I often have the testcase open and so on that page would be the most relevant place for the link locations.
So with this in mind, I think the link locations you suggested would work perfectly. Ade. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > I think Adrian meant for this to hit everyone :-) > > That said, Adrian I added the links at the top of the page in the > announcement area talking about how to use the tool. Should we add a link > there to the bug documentation? Would that work? > > Nicholas > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: QATracker Survey: Time > for a new look? Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:39:29 +0100 From: Adrian > Goodyer <adriangood...@gmail.com> <adriangood...@gmail.com> To: Nicholas > Skaggs <nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> <nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> > > Great work Pasi, this is sure to make the reporting process a lot quicker > and easier. > > I remembered when I first started submitting test case results, the main > thing I struggled with was how to report bugs in unusual dialogue screens > (e.g. during installs) and then how to report correctly. > > For the sake of newer testers would it be possible to link to this > information somewhere in this page? > > > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > >
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
