On 06/12/13 20:18, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
On 12/06/2013 02:05 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
Why I *changed pages* without asking
- Because I guess letting people make changes and discussing only
those on which we don't agree makes *further progress*, further than
speaking everything before hand. And if there's no consensus letting
other's opinion to prevail.
Alberto I applaud your willingness to make changes and be proactive.
That said, we need to discuss things first.
- How much *time* do you thing a message like this will someone take
to write? And to answer? How do you see this for *every choose* (or
not choose)?
Making changes prompts discussion, and as you noted, if you want to
make big changes you don't want to discuss them all before making
them. The answer to this is to copy the wiki pages in question and
make your changes there so others can see. For example, I can clone
the entire QATeam wiki to a new page under my name, ala
wiki.ubuntu.com/balloons/QATeam
and make drastic changes there. Then ask others for feedback. Does
this make sense? Look at the
Again, I'm always glad to see people striving to keep the wiki
relevant and up to date. So I applaud your work. I think it just
happened in the wrong place. Can you copy everything over to a new
place under your name and revert the changes you made then on the
primary pages? We can discuss and tweak things on the copies, and once
we're ready, replace the main pages again.
Thanks,
Nicholas
Other than to say, that having discussions about this sort of thing
amongst those affected sums up the communal nature of wiki, I'll say no
more - this represents my view nicely.//
/
/Elfy
--
Ubuntu Forum Council Member
Xubuntu QA Lead
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
