Alberto Salvia Novella:
Do you mean papercuts could be better tracked using a tag?
There is a problem with that. One purpose of the papercuts project is to
train incomers in quality assurance. And having a separate project for
that allows people setting bug statuses and importances without needing
to belong to the Bug Control team, which requires been already skilled
in triaging.
Flocculant:
> Adding HundredPaperCuts - then that never changing - mucks up our bug
> tracking.
Many times updating those settings is pointless because
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts) already filters
those bugs.
Moreover if you think that outdated info mucks up the panel, you can
just update it yourself simply by copying that in the package. As both
should coincide.
Flocculant:
> My interest here lies in the issue it causes us when it's added as an
> affected project in Launchpad.
Is there any further issue than the project just been listed in the panel?
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
