On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote: > On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > >Flocculant: > >>Is this why you have never responded to Xubuntu bugs? > > > >Yes, as I informed Pasi Lallinaho. > > > > > >Flocculant: > >> We track bug status - and as the Hundred status never changes this > >> causes us problems. > > > >Setting importance is not because the Papercuts project, but for debugging > >Ubuntu itself. > > > >As spoke to Pasi, the reason why you disagree on my setting is because you > >disagree with (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance) in the first > >place. Setting cosmetic bugs as they have high importance, the same as if > >the application did not worked at all. > > > > > No. > > This is not about bug importance at all. > > That is a different issue. > > What I am saying is that adding HundredPaperCuts - then that never changing > - mucks up our bug tracking.
Could you elaborate on how having a task for a project that isn't Ubuntu affects your ability to track the bug? Thanks! -- Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
