On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 03:13:51 +0200
php fan <php4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > And if it is not, then it would get marked "Won't Fix" when
> > someone goes through and does post-EOL-release cleanup.  
> 
> It sounds like that would be the right thing to do. If it's not going
> to be fixed, let's at least avoid people the frustration, confusion,
> and possible waste of time caused by having bullshit information on
> Launchpad.
> 
> Note also that, given that this bug was claimed to be fixed for Wily
> and it isn't, I am quite skeptic that it's really fixed in Trusty
> too. If I were a member of a QA team, I would test it on Trusty.
> There's a simple, copy-pastable command to run to see whether or not
> the bug is fixed. I would test it myself if I had any box with Trusty.
> 
> 
> 
> > and prepare your environments
> > for upgrading to Xenial when Wily dies on the 28th.  
> 
> Speaking of "preparing my environments" (that's funny btw: you
> shouldn't be supposed to have to "prepare" anything at all for an
> upgrade), so is there some "preparation" I can do to make sure that I
> don't brick my computer with the upgrade as per issue 1551623? Or at
> least, some check I can do to know whether my system is affected, so
> that I don't upgrade in that case? (I'd rather have a "dead" Wily,
> dead as in "past the EOL", than a dead system, dead as in "it doesn't
> boot").

@php4fan:

I expected you to have understood, as of now, that this list, and
all of the Ubuntu lists, are bound by the CoC.

As such, putting you on moderation.

Cheers,

..C.. 

Attachment: pgpdF9Rxd4lPF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Reply via email to