Brian Murray:
> "Substituting FILE with your file name" still seems incomplete to me.
The hole section is about how to generate a file, where the previous
step already mentions which file we are talking about:
"Copy the generated file to the system used for filing the report"
I don't think we need to clarify further what FILE is. The deixis is
already strong there.
Gunnar Hjalmarsson:
> Personally I'd like to see much of what you removed be reinserted.
When the guide was like before people was asking frequently how to
report bugs. It wasn't till I put a video-tutorial in the top of the
page when they stopped doing so.
I also asked a couple of people to show me in person how they would be
reporting bugs using that guide. Both took long time to figure it out,
and mentioned they would normally give up.
If you bring back the guide as it was nobody except us will be using it.
We are better only putting there what is common, and letting people ask
the infrequent cases. If something really hurts afterwards we can bring
the pieces back from the historic at any time.
Brian Murray:
> Did you feel like you had reached a consensus with editors of the
> page?
After a period of a week nobody opposed, and I have addressed all the
individual issues that people reported about it.
Moreover my latest poll was also performed outside of Ubuntu. And it
showed that were half the outsiders disagreed, hundred percent of
insiders disagreed. And the polls were verbatim.
So in my view I cannot take disagreement too seriously here. I'm open to
consider any option, except staying the same that proves not to work.
There's only one place where there aren't any issues:
(https://goo.gl/DmGDfR)
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
