On 11-03-30 03:57 PM, Ralph Janke wrote: > On 03/30/2011 02:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:59 -0400, Chuck Short wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think we should re-evaluate if nagios is the monitoring solution we >>> want to support and if it easy make really really easy to deploy. >>> >> Seems to me that we should consider dropping nagios from main and >> promoting icinga as its replacement: >> >> https://www.icinga.org/faq/why-a-fork/ >> > +1 from me
Not that I care a whole lot, but isn't this somewhat the same debate as MySQL vs. one of the many forks? Nagios is now an household brand in IT. I would be very, very cautious about dumping that out in favor of a recent fork. I am all for doing a competitive analysis, but please take market adoption into account. (Not that I have any love for Nagios; it's hairy and bynzantine. Just saying that we should be cautious here.) -- Etienne Goyer Technical Account Manager - Canonical Ltd Ubuntu Certified Instructor - LPIC-3 ~= Ubuntu: Linux for Human Beings =~ -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
