On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
Yes, except that AudioVideo;Audio and AudioVideo would be enough so long
as All the Audio applications have AudioVideo;Audio. Most Video
Applications are AudioVideo and it is hard to argue they should include
Video without most of them also being Audio, ie. AudioVideo;Audio;Video;
If something is both Audio and Video, then it is AudioVideo.
It is true, that technically you won't need ever need Video, if you want
to separate Audio from Video applications. But, I'm sure you agree that
would be going too far with optimizing the number of categories.
I do agree. What I am saying is that prioritizing adding Audio to those
applications that are audio but only have AudioVideo at present would
allow us to move faster. Adding Video at some point would also be helpful,
but adding Audio is a more present need.
I am speaking of short term and long term goals. Long term, having great
categories for all applications can only help. Making Studio easier to
maintain and deal with new SW the user may install, will help us in
UbuntuStudio now with less work in this area so we can work elsewhere. It
will also make Studio work better for 16.04. I don't know how wide spread
the term is, but I would say lets get the "low hanging fruit" first.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
