On Sat, 2 Apr 2016, Ross Gammon wrote:
Prompted by a comment by Len on IRC (about Audacious), I did a quick
check for obvious packages that might have dropped of our DVD without a
conscious action.
When producing the Package QA Tracker, I prioritised the Test Cases
based on what was in our menu at the time.
The only one that seems to have dropped off is Audacious:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1565040
Probably would have to compare LTS to LTS.
Is there any reason why I shouldn't add these to to our seeds? I don't
want to randomly add packages without thinking about it first.
The proper thing to do (too late this cycle) is to create a new meta for
desktop utilities we want to make sure are there no matter which DE gets
used. My list would include:
- a video player (one that video producers want to test with)
- audio player
- gparted (this is on the ISO anyway)
- synaptic
- pavucontrol (KDE's audio control is hard to follow or porvide support with)
- ubuntustudio-controls
This is just my personal list I have found useful as I have installed
Studio's metas on other DEs. It is not nessessarily complete or correct.
There are of course other apps I always install as well like joe, but that
is totally person preference.
--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
--
ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
