Go ahead and add the packages but thoroughly check for incompatibility issues between versions and/or other various bugs inside releases of the application(s). Currently I see no problems that may emerge in the near or distant future, Audacious should be fine but keep a close eye on Shotwell and Synaptic.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Ross Gammon <ubu...@the-gammons.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > Prompted by a comment by Len on IRC (about Audacious), I did a quick > check for obvious packages that might have dropped of our DVD without a > conscious action. > > When producing the Package QA Tracker, I prioritised the Test Cases > based on what was in our menu at the time. > > The only one that seems to have dropped off is Audacious: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1565040 > > And then when checking the bugs for Len's Synaptic bug, I discovered a > bug related to Shotwell: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta/+bug/1189250 > > Is there any reason why I shouldn't add these to to our seeds? I don't > want to randomly add packages without thinking about it first. > > Cheers, > > Ross > > -- > ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
