In my work which includes manual updates and excluding packages with problem newer versions Synaptic in mandatory. Anytime I install Ubuntu, Mint, or Debian anywhere it's something I always install if not already present.
On 4/5/2016 at 1:41 PM, "Matthew Bearson" <club.nintendo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Go ahead and add the packages but thoroughly check for >incompatibility >issues between versions and/or other various bugs inside releases >of the >application(s). >Currently I see no problems that may emerge in the near or distant >future, >Audacious should be fine but keep a close eye on Shotwell and >Synaptic. > >On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Ross Gammon <ubuntu@the- >gammons.net> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Prompted by a comment by Len on IRC (about Audacious), I did a >quick >> check for obvious packages that might have dropped of our DVD >without a >> conscious action. >> >> When producing the Package QA Tracker, I prioritised the Test >Cases >> based on what was in our menu at the time. >> >> The only one that seems to have dropped off is Audacious: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio- >meta/+bug/1565040 >> >> And then when checking the bugs for Len's Synaptic bug, I >discovered a >> bug related to Shotwell: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio- >meta/+bug/1189250 >> >> Is there any reason why I shouldn't add these to to our seeds? I >don't >> want to randomly add packages without thinking about it first. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ross >> >> -- >> ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list >> ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel >> -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
