If -controls is working in 16.04 and the new version works for 18.04, probably best to leave the version in 16.04 alone for manpower reasons.
Just my two cents. Erich > On Apr 9, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Len Ovens <l...@ovenwerks.net> wrote: > > Systemd is somewhat of a headache. I have been testing -controls in 1804 and > ondemand has been moved to systemd. Not only that, some of the kernel modules > don't seem to be loaded before cpufreq runs. I can fix all this stuff but if > I do, -controls will be something that works for 1804 but not for 1604. > (where the exact cutoff would be I don't know) > > Any opinions as to supporting older versions in -controls, or should we just > go forward? > > My thoughts are to move forward as we don't seem to do back ports anyway, so > Ardour for 16.04 is still 4.* even though active development is on 6.0. I'm > sure other applications are similar. > > -- > Len Ovens > www.ovenwerks.net > > > -- > ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list > ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
