On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:44 +0000, Sean Miller wrote: > I think one year is too short as it wouldn't give time for any culture > change to come into effect and as such it wouldn't be possible to > judge the existing Team Leader's effectiveness... it's surprising how > fast a year goes. > > Perhaps every 2 years there should be an election, even if it is the > incumbant standing unopposed. 2 years is, I think, enough time for a > person to make his/her mark. > > Sean >
You are very right about how time does fly and especially as we get older, a bit frightening just how fast sometimes. :-) 2 years is enough time for making your mark and introducing change resulting in visible difference. Any longer would be a little too long IMHO, but any term length would be subject to a group wide vote. Regards Phil
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
