On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 07:35 +0000, mac wrote: > You'll probably have seen this: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/karmic_koala_frustration/ > > Not the press we'd have hoped for - and from a usually friendly source. > I must say, I, too, had a bit of a problem with an upgrade from 9.04 > (just a failure of the automatic restart, and, on manual reboot, some > warnings about unmet dependencies that were easily fixed with apt-get). > On the other hand, a clean install went fine. > > Both of these boxes were elderly, and were machines I keep for playing > with, so no big deal if they go wrong. I must say, though, that I won't > be upgrading my 'production' machines just yet. > > mac > >
just to note that article is filled with statistical crap of the highest ridiculousness, as always, the loudest voice is never of the people who are happy, but rather of the few who have problems. -- Gordon Allott <gord.all...@canonical.com> Canonical
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
