On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Patrick Olson <compma...@linuxusers.us> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 15:08:56 -0800, Walter Lapchynski <w...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: >> What kind of testing did you have in mind? > I hadn't really thought it through. I just figured testing would be where I > was least "like a fish out of water" since that's where my work experience > is. However, maybe the question is what can I do with limited Internet > bandwidth and old hardware?
I'd say bugs would be a good place for you. You can help with triage (part of which is confirming the actual bug, which is a form of testing). Basically they confirm bugs and gather enough information that they can then be passed onto developers. Often times testing to figure out the actual problem is involved. Not to mention pulling down fixes upstream (if you grab the diff, it's very small) and make sure they actually do what they're supposed to do without regression. More info here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Triage I'm part of the Bug Squad/Bug Control, so I can help you there, too! -- @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader -- Ubuntu-us-or mailing list Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or